STT Net Debt / EBITDA: current value, 10-year range and year-by-year history
Cash & Leverage
Net Debt / EBITDA History
Historically priceyAbove avgAround avgBelow avgHistorically cheap
STT Net Debt / EBITDA by year
Yearly range of STT’s net debt / ebitda from 2016 to 2026. Over the full period it ranged from -30.8 to 7.0, averaging -16.2.
| Year | Low | Average | High | Year-end |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -21.9 | -8.4 | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| 2025 | -20.8 | -7.1 | 7.0 | 5.9 |
| 2024 | -30.8 | -24.0 | -19.8 | -19.8 |
| 2023 | -21.1 | -16.8 | -14.4 | -21.1 |
| 2022 | -19.6 | -19.0 | -18.0 | -19.5 |
| 2021 | -22.9 | -20.1 | -15.3 | -20.1 |
| 2020 | -24.0 | -20.4 | -14.5 | -22.5 |
| 2019 | -14.3 | -12.3 | -10.9 | -14.3 |
| 2018 | -16.1 | -14.4 | -12.3 | -14.3 |
| 2017 | -16.5 | -14.6 | -13.5 | -13.5 |
| 2016 | -19.6 | -18.8 | -18.0 | -18.0 |
Get notified when STT Net Debt / EBITDA crosses a threshold
Free — one alert setup, notifications by push, Telegram, or Discord.
How many years of operating earnings it would take to pay off the company's net debt. The most common leverage ratio — higher means more financial risk and less flexibility.
Formula
(Total Debt − Cash) / EBITDAHow to read this chart
Watch the trend more than the level. Declining ratio = deleveraging, growing financial flexibility. Rising ratio = increasing leverage, which constrains dividends, buybacks, and future investment.
Key caveats
- Sector context is essential: 3× is aggressive for a consumer brand but normal for a regulated utility. Always compare to sector peers.
- Large acquisitions spike the ratio temporarily — check whether the integration plan credibly drives paydown.
Pro — up to 30-year history
Unlock 10y, 15y, 20y, and 30y history with peer comparison and CSV export.