ZM Net Debt / EBITDA: current value, 10-year range and year-by-year history
Cash & Leverage
Net Debt / EBITDA History
Historically priceyAbove avgAround avgBelow avgHistorically cheap
ZM Net Debt / EBITDA by year
Yearly range of ZM’s net debt / ebitda from 2019 to 2026. Over the full period it ranged from -31.1 to -0.2, averaging -3.7.
| Year | Low | Average | High | Year-end |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.5 | -0.3 | -0.2 | -0.2 |
| 2025 | -1.0 | -0.7 | -0.6 | -0.6 |
| 2024 | -2.4 | -1.8 | -1.1 | -1.1 |
| 2023 | -5.9 | -4.8 | -3.0 | -4.3 |
| 2022 | -1.8 | -1.3 | -1.0 | -1.8 |
| 2021 | -3.1 | -1.9 | -1.1 | -1.1 |
| 2020 | -8.7 | -5.4 | -1.5 | -1.5 |
| 2019 | -31.1 | -12.7 | -3.7 | -8.0 |
Get notified when ZM Net Debt / EBITDA crosses a threshold
Free — one alert setup, notifications by push, Telegram, or Discord.
How many years of operating earnings it would take to pay off the company's net debt. The most common leverage ratio — higher means more financial risk and less flexibility.
Formula
(Total Debt − Cash) / EBITDAHow to read this chart
Watch the trend more than the level. Declining ratio = deleveraging, growing financial flexibility. Rising ratio = increasing leverage, which constrains dividends, buybacks, and future investment.
Key caveats
- Sector context is essential: 3× is aggressive for a consumer brand but normal for a regulated utility. Always compare to sector peers.
- Large acquisitions spike the ratio temporarily — check whether the integration plan credibly drives paydown.
Pro — up to 30-year history
Unlock 10y, 15y, 20y, and 30y history with peer comparison and CSV export.