GIS Payout Ratio: current value, 10-year range and year-by-year history
Cash & Leverage
Payout Ratio History
GIS Payout Ratio by year
Yearly range of GIS’s payout ratio from 2016 to 2026. Over the full period it ranged from 37.6% to 80.6%, averaging 54.3%.
| Year | Low | Average | High | Year-end |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 79.9% | 80.2% | 80.6% | 80.6% |
| 2025 | 53.6% | 61.8% | 73.6% | 73.6% |
| 2024 | 47.6% | 51.2% | 55.9% | 47.6% |
| 2023 | 50.1% | 58.3% | 64.5% | 56.9% |
| 2022 | 45.1% | 48.2% | 51.6% | 51.6% |
| 2021 | 38.9% | 48.7% | 55.7% | 49.5% |
| 2020 | 37.6% | 40.8% | 48.0% | 39.3% |
| 2019 | 49.5% | 52.5% | 55.3% | 49.5% |
| 2018 | 49.8% | 53.2% | 57.7% | 57.7% |
| 2017 | 49.5% | 59.5% | 66.1% | 49.5% |
| 2016 | 62.0% | 62.0% | 62.0% | 62.0% |
Get notified when GIS Payout Ratio crosses a threshold
Free — one alert setup, notifications by push, Telegram, or Discord.
What fraction of free cash flow is paid out as dividends. More reliable than the earnings-based payout ratio because cash is harder to manipulate through accounting choices. Low ratio = room to grow the dividend and absorb an earnings dip. High ratio = dividend is consuming most of the cash generated.
TTM Dividends Per Share / (TTM FCF ÷ Shares) × 100%A steadily rising FCF payout ratio warrants scrutiny only if FCF itself is flat or falling — that means the company is paying out a larger slice of shrinking cash. A high but stable ratio in a capital-light business (e.g. consumer staples) can be perfectly sustainable.
- FCF can be lumpy: large one-off capex or working-capital swings distort a single year. Look at the multi-year trend rather than any single data point.
- Utilities and REITs naturally sustain 60–90% FCF payout ratios; industrials and tech companies typically run 20–50%. Always compare to sector context.
Unlock 10y, 15y, 20y, and 30y history with peer comparison and CSV export.