AMT Net Debt / EBITDA: current value, 10-year range and year-by-year history
Cash & Leverage
Net Debt / EBITDA History
Historically priceyAbove avgAround avgBelow avgHistorically cheap
AMT Net Debt / EBITDA by year
Yearly range of AMT’s net debt / ebitda from 2016 to 2026. Over the full period it ranged from 4.9 to 8.3, averaging 6.5.
| Year | Low | Average | High | Year-end |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 6.2 |
| 2025 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| 2024 | 5.6 | 6.4 | 6.9 | 5.6 |
| 2023 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 7.2 |
| 2022 | 6.1 | 7.0 | 7.9 | 7.2 |
| 2021 | 6.8 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| 2020 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 2019 | 5.9 | 6.3 | 7.2 | 7.2 |
| 2018 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 4.9 |
| 2017 | 4.9 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| 2016 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.3 |
Get notified when AMT Net Debt / EBITDA crosses a threshold
Free — one alert setup, notifications by push, Telegram, or Discord.
How many years of operating earnings it would take to pay off the company's net debt. The most common leverage ratio — higher means more financial risk and less flexibility.
Formula
(Total Debt − Cash) / EBITDAHow to read this chart
Watch the trend more than the level. Declining ratio = deleveraging, growing financial flexibility. Rising ratio = increasing leverage, which constrains dividends, buybacks, and future investment.
Key caveats
- Sector context is essential: 3× is aggressive for a consumer brand but normal for a regulated utility. Always compare to sector peers.
- Large acquisitions spike the ratio temporarily — check whether the integration plan credibly drives paydown.
Pro — up to 30-year history
Unlock 10y, 15y, 20y, and 30y history with peer comparison and CSV export.